|
The primary reason for requiring assistance is that it was assumed that professional help might be able to steer many debtors in the direction of a debt repayment plan rather than having them apply for bankruptcy. Not too many debtors ever have any kind of formal education when it comes to taking care of their money, so some education could help them later. Since the law was ratified at the urging of the charge card industry, the provision of the law requiring professional assistance was added in order to entice more people to pay their way out of debt. There were several reasons for inserting this provision in the bankruptcy legislation, one of which was to provide clients with a little money handling education that they otherwise might not get.
More often than not, a consumer's debt burden is caused by either an unforeseen job loss or a medical crisis, such as an accident or illness. That most people with debt problems end up filing for court-ordered debt relief shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone; most debtors who file do so as they simply cannot pay their debts. Nobody wants to file for bankruptcy; it destroys your credit score and makes it very difficult to take out a loan, find an apartment, or even get a job. A recent study shows that an astonishing 97% of all people who have submitted to financial guidance as required by the new debt relief law have ended up filing for bankruptcy. It is clear that required guidance has not worked as intended. The thought that people apply for bankruptcy because they just don't want to pay is a misconception. Many, if not most people apply for debt relief because they have suffered from things beyond their control.
Unless Congress decides that the bill is flawed, debtors will continue to undergo financial guidance, whether it aids them or not. That’s a shame.
|